As we know the fantastic is the difference between something
two situations, a supernatural or naturalistic. For example,
in the film Suspiria, there were a lot of supernatural
situations that occurred but at the same time there were
naturalistic possibilities. For the killing that happened,
they were backed up with naturalistic excuses; such as
the dog killing its owner more so mutilating his face.
It is his Seeing Eye dog. Why would it just go crazy
like that? My reason, it was possessed. I don’t believe
that the dog would have psychological problems, he wasn’t
being taunted or provoked at the time he attacked his owner.

What about Sarah? She knew that whatever or whoever
it was coming for her. Even though she should have
been paying should have been paying closer attention
jumping into the wires that killed her, the witches
told her friend she just disappeared. Not that these
kinds of unfortunate situations couldn’t happen to
anyone but considering the place the girls are staying
someone should have heard something. How did Sarah know
that someone or something was after her? She did not seem
to have any psychological problems it is a possibility.

From Carroll’s point view , I belive he would see this movie as classified as “Art Horror”. There was a possible being that existedwhich was the monstrous witch that was revealed at the end it opposed a threat due to the murders of this film, it was certainly impure, and there was a lot of violence. Situations arised were the coginitive/ evaluative symptoms would come to place. Fear, cringing , screaming , and the “hair raising “ affect was definitely there, especially for me.
I really enjoyed this movie because of the suspense. It kept me wanting to watch.